Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 F.2d 353 - Levi v. United States

Levi v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

71 F.2d 353 · 1934

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
April 1988
most recently cited

34 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently April 1988 · most notably Barfield v. United States (1956), Hale v. United States (1969)

34 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

180193419401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wilson v. United States · Illinois Central Railroad v. Fuentes · Grimsley v. United States · Niederluecke v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * Possession of goods recently stolen justifies the inference that the possessor has guilty knowledge of the theft, in the absence of explanatory facts or circumstances consistent with his innocence. Wilson v. United States, 162 U.S. 613 , 16 S.Ct. 895 , 40 L.Ed. 1090 . * * * Under these circumstances, surely it was for the jury to say whether such explanation as he gave was true or false. * * * ” (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.