Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 F.2d 622 - Walker v. Lee

Walker v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

71 F.2d 622 · 1934

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
November 1963
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently November 1963

17 federal appellate · 1 district ·

801934194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re Peterson · The Baltimore · Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co. · Wooster v. Handy · Appliance Inv. v. Western Electric Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We cannot say from the record that the question at issue is one going to the right of the trial court to allow costs as distinguished from the discretionary power to allow such costs; hence, the order is not appealable and the appeal is dismissed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.