Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 F.2d 901 - Union Indemnity Co. v. Lang

Union Indemnity Co. v. Lang’s Empirical Analysis

71 F.2d 901 · 1934

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
June 1969
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Schwimmer · Trainor Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. · Roberts v. Security Trust & Savings Bank · Jose Rivera Soler & Co. v. United Firemen's Insurance · Sather Banking Co. v. Arthur R. Briggs Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Nor does it matter of what value this notice was to the defendant, or whether it was of any value. In a Court of law, effect is to be given to the bargain according to its terms, and Courts of law cannot speculate upon the weight attached to one or another of the elements of an obligation. The defendant bound himself only in a given way, and can be held only by the bargain he made, at least in the form of this action.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.