Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 F.3d 1073 - Brien Da19640 v. Kullman Industries Inc

Brien Da19640 v. Kullman Industries Inc’s Empirical Analysis

71 F.3d 1073 · 1995

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
March 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably American Alliance Insurance v. Eagle Insurance (1996), Gucci America Incorporated Guess? Inc v. Gold Center Jewelry "N" 1-8 (1998)

2 federal appellate · 2 district ·

130199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Griffin v. United States · Lumpkin v. Lumpkin · Demos v. Supreme Court of Washington · Davis v. Musler · Enron Oil Corp. v. Diakuhara

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'(1) whether the default was willful; (2) whether defendant has a meritorious defense; and (3) the level of prejudice that may occur to the nondefaulting party if relief is granted.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “24 The District Court did not consider the question of whether American would suffer any prejudice from having to prosecute its claim against Eagle after a lengthy delay. American, however, does not attempt to uphold denial of the motion to vacate on the ground of prejudice. Conclusion 25 Although the denial of a motion for relief from a default judgment is reviewed only for abuse of discretion,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Setting Aside Default. For good cause shown, the court may set aside an entry of default and, if a judgment by default has been entered, may likewise set it aside in accordance with Rule 60(b).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.