Klump v. Duffus’s Empirical Analysis
71 F.3d 1368 · 1995
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 2 district · 21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably Rar Incorporated v. Turner Diesel Limited (1997), Hyatt International Corp. v. Coco (2002)
13 federal appellate · 2 district · 21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 5 U.S.C. § 1101 (Civil Service Miscellaneous Amendments)
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson · Calder v. Jones · Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`exercise jurisdiction on any other basis now or hereafter permitted by the Illinois Constitution and the Constitution of the United States.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In a malpractice action, a plaintiff's "actual injury" is measured by the amount of money she would have actually collected had her attorney not been negligent. A plaintiff is to be returned only to the same position she would have occupied had the tort not occurred.... Hypothetical damages above the amount that [the plaintiff] could genuinely have collected from [the defendant] are not a legitimate portion of her "actual injury;" awarding her those damages would result in a windfall.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“are not a legitimate portion of her `actual injury;' awarding her those damages would result in a windfall.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.