United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
71 F.3d 139 · 1995
Citation profile
29 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably United States v. Aramony (1996), United States v. David (1996)
29 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1757 · 12 U.S.C. § 1781 · 18 U.S.C. § 1505 · 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Arizona v. Fulminante · Sullivan v. Louisiana · Rose v. Clark · United States v. Gaudin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“gives a criminal defendant the right to have a jury determine, beyond a reasonable doubt, his guilt of every element of the crime with which he is charged,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“You are told that the [financial institution] is a credit union within the terms of [the] statute.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“After the government has presented its evidence as to each element, and the defendant has had the opportunity to present a defense, if the defendant so chooses, the judge must [correctly] instruct the jury on the law applicable to the issues raised at trial. See United States v. White Horse, 807 F.2d 1426 , 1430 (8th Cir.1986). Under Sixth Amendment jurisprudence, the next two steps are strictly for the jury: (1) determining the facts as to each element of the crime, and (2) applying the law as instructed by the judge to those facts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.