Pedraza v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
71 F.3d 194 · 1995
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Watts v. Kroger Co. (1999), Sports Racing Services, Inc. v. Sports Car Club of America, Inc. (1997)
20 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1821 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand · Crawford Fitting Company v. Jt Gibbons Inc Champion International Corporation · Owens v. Okure · Local 408, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'the expenditure of public funds [on behalf of an indigent litigant] is proper only when authorized by Congress....'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the district court did not abuse its discretion”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.