Reese’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2013
1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Marks v. United States · MacArthur Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp. · Pinney Dock & Transport Co. v. Penn Central Corp. · Lee v. Georgia · Lehnert v. Ferris Faculty Assn.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a local bargaining representative may charge objecting employees for their pro rata share of the costs associated with otherwise chargeable activities of its state and national affiliates, even if those activities were not performed for the direct benefit of the objecting employees' bargaining unit.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]here must be some indication that the payment is for services that may ultimately inure to the benefit of the members of the local union by virtue of their membership in the parent organization.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“unions' costs of negotiating, ratifying, enforcing and administering the collective bargaining agreement between the unions and the City”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.