Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 F.3d 679 - Walrath v. Getty

Walrath v. Getty’s Empirical Analysis

71 F.3d 679 · 1995

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
February 2008
most recently cited

6 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Morrissey v. Brewer · Barefoot v. Estelle · Zannino v. Arnold · United States v. Tonry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A court of review need only determine whether the information relied on by the Commission is sufficient to provide a factual basis for its reasons. The inquiry is not whether the Commission’s decision is supported by the preponderance of the evidence, or even by substantial evidence; the inquiry is only whether there is a rational basis in the record for the Commission’s conclusions embodied in its statement of reasons.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'[i]t is apparent that Congress intended to give the Parole Commission great latitude in making decisions relative to [parole] revocation.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.