Odei v. Garland’s Empirical Analysis
2023
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on United States v. Zannino · Jianli Chen v. Holder · Ahmed v. Holder · Singh v. Mukasey · Sompotan v. Mukasey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A causal connection between the harm incurred and the petitioner's statutorily protected ground exists only if the protected ground 'was "one central reason”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Odei v. Garland, 71 F.4th 75, 79 (1st Cir. 2023) - 10 - (quoting Sanchez-Vazquez, 994 F.3d at 47 ); see 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (b)(1)(B)(i). The”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Caz v. Garland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.