Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

71 F. App'x 240

Roark v. Smith

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided August 11, 2003

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2003-08-11

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Decided 2003-08-11

PER CURIAM.

¶1William Wayne Roark, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. According*241ly, we affirm because, as noted by the district court, Roark failed to demonstrate that 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) is an inadequate or ineffective remedy. See In re Vial, 115 F.Sd 1192, 1194 n. 5 (4th Cir.1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2AFFIRMED.

/71/fappx/240 · .json · Public domain