Advanced Accessory Systems, LLC v. Gibbs’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1961
Relies on Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKey · Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co. · City of Burlington v. Dague · Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc. · Parr v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]hough City of Burlington dealt with the award of attorneys' fees specified in certain federal statutes, and is therefore not binding on the district court in this instance, it does offer strong persuasive authority for the reasonableness of the district court's calculation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.