United States v. Wallace’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on United States v. Olano · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · United States v. Young · Massiah v. United States · United States v. Duarte
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“wildly unlikely that this brief and isolated comment so swayed the jury that the outcome of the trial was affected.” Wallace, 71 Fed.Appx. 868 at 872 . 16 . The context in which this statement was made is as follows:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] successful Massiah objection requires a defendant to show, at a bare minimum, that the person with whom he conversed had previously been enlisted for that purpose by the authorities.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.