¶1This cause coming on to be heard upon a motion to strike the bill of exceptions from the transcript of the record on the ground that said bill of exceptions omits and fails to contain all the evidence adduced in the trial of the cause, although the defendant in error demanded that all of said evidence be included in said bill of exceptions, all of which appears from the transcript, and in the consideration of said motion, the court having considered the entire merits of the cause, and coming to the conclusion that the plaintiffs in error have failed to make any reversible error to appear. The irregularity complained of, touching the conveying of two jurors from their homes to and from the place of trial by the counsel for defendant in error in an automobile, was not complained of until after verdict, when, to avail the plaintiffs in error, who had full knowledge thereof, it should have been raised and objected to before verdict, so that the trial cpurt could have discharged *276the jurors and declared a mistrial. The judgment below is hereby affirmed at the costs of plaintiffs in error.
71 Fla. 274
Miller v. Pace
Decided March 1, 1916
Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1916-03-01
<p>Writ of Error to Circuit Court, Seminole County; Jas. W. Perkins, Judge.</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Judgment affirmed · Decided 1916-03-01
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 2004
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →