Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 FSUPP2D 365 - Catizone v. Wolff

Catizone v. Wolff’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
June 2019
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Schlaifer Nance Company v. Estate of Andy Warhol W · Greene v. Greene · Graubard Mollen Dannett & Horowitz v. Moskovitz · Priest v. Hennessy · Croce v. Kurnit

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1) whether a fee arrangement was entered into or a fee paid; 2) whether a written contract or retainer agreement exists indicating that the attorney accepted representation; 3) whether there was an informal relationship whereby the attorney performed legal services gratuitously; 4) whether the attorney actually represented the individual in one aspect of the matter (e.g., at a deposition); 5) whether the attorney excluded the individual from some aspect of [the] litigation in order to protect another (or a) client’s interest; 6) whether the purported client believes that the attorney was representing him and whether this belief is reasonable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.