Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 Haw. 347 - State v. Moriwaki

State v. Moriwaki’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
June 2020
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently June 2020 · most notably State v. Okumura (1995), State v. Rogan (1999)

30 state decisions

1801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Harkins v. Ikeda · State v. Sugimoto · United States v. Prichard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'if there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The prosecution has a duty `to seek justice, to exercise the highest good faith in the interest of the public and to avoid even the appearance of unfair advantage over the accused.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The duties of each court reporter shall be to ... write down all the testimony of witnesses in shorthand, together with the proceedings and objections of counsel, exclusive of argument, the rulings of the court, charge to the jury, and any other matter which the court may require the reporter to report.”). 15 . Translated into legal terms, the jury was obviously inquiring whether the state of mind requisite to the commission of first degree assault applied to the result—i.e.,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.