Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 Haw. 564 - State v. Hicks

State v. Hicks’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
June 2006
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Brown · State v. Schutter · 7 Haw. App. 586 - State v. Masaniai

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The statutory language of HRS § 710-1077(5) is clear. When a person is convicted of criminal contempt of court, the particular circumstances of the offense must be fully set forth in the judgment and order or warrant of commitment. This is required whenever there is a conviction for criminal contempt of court, not only in cases where imprisonment is imposed. Oral findings are not enough to satisfy the mandate of the statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.