Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 Idaho 150 - Ashbauth v. Davis

Ashbauth v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
4
states following
June 1975
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 1975

6 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

120195119601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 16 Cal. 2d 516 - Bank of California v. Superior Court · Notten v. Mensing · Estate of Rath · McCabe v. Healy · Anderson v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * As early as 1886 this court held that the term, ‘claim’ does not include causes of action purely equitable, and in which purely equitable relief is sought. Toulouse v. Burkett, 2 Idaho 184 , 10 P. 26”.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.