State v. Slater’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2016
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Beesskove · People v. Ross · State v. Sedam · People v. Wong Wang · People v. Webber
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Justice Keeton having announced the decision in this cause on May 9, 1951, to the effect that the judgment be reversed and the cause be remanded with instructions to the trial court to set the judgment aside and sustain the appellant’s motion in arrest of judgment, “It is therefore ordered That the judgment * * * be and is reversed, and the cause is remanded with instructions to the trial court to set the judgment aside, and sustain the appellant’s motion in arrest of judgment.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Slater
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.