Black v. Darrah’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 1991
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Clark v. Alloway · Gunnell v. Largilliere Co. · Cogswell v. C. C. Anderson Stores Co. · Reinhold v. Spencer · Dover Lumber Co. v. Case
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * Appellant was not prejudiced in any substantial right by the failure of the court to instruct the jury to add interest if they found for respondent, and in place thereof, allowing interest in the judgment.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Coffin v. Cox
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.