Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 KAN 779 - State v. Bundy

State v. Bundy’s Empirical Analysis

1905

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
May 1985
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 1985

9 state decisions

20190519101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Bennington · State v. Cooper · State v. Chiles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““After the trial has begun and jeopardy has attached the defendant has a right to insist that the case shall proceed to a final result, and if he cannot be convicted upon the information as it stands when the trial commences he is ordinarily entitled.to an acquittal.” (p. 782.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.