¶1The certificate of the trial judge that the suit involves the tax law of the state is not binding on this court. (Railroad Co. v. Morasch, 60 Kan. 251, 56 Pac. 133.) An investigation of the question presented to the court below shows that the tax laws of the state were not involved in the suit. There being less than $100 in controversy, the proceeding in error is dismissed.
71 Kan. 873
Huffman v. Ackarman
Decided June 10, 1905
Supreme Court of Kansas · decided 1905-06-10
<p>Error from Chautauqua district court; Granville P. Aikman, judge.</p>
Relies on Erb v. Morasch
Dismissed · Decided 1905-06-10