Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 MICH 180 - In re Stockman

In re Stockman’s Empirical Analysis

1888

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
6
states following
November 1948
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 1948

8 state decisions

201888189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morrell v. Dickey · Leonard v. Putnam · Townsend v. Kendall · Boyd v. Glass · Bennet v. Bennet

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Comity cannot be considered in a case like this, when the future welfare of the child is the vital question in the case. The good of the child is superior to all other considerations. It is the polar star to guide to the conclusion in all cases of infants, whether the question is raised upon a writ of habeas corpus or in a court of chancery. The infant’s desire in determining where she shall. reside, if of sufficient age and uninfluenced, is always listened to with interest, and in this case we have it marked and most emphatic. She wants to remain where she is.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re Leu

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.