¶1CCA 20090615. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER SPECIFICATION 1 OF CHARGE II FAILS TO STATE AN OFFENSE BECAUSE IT DOES NOT EXPRESSLY ALLEGE OR NECESSARILY IMPLY THE TERMINAL ELEMENT OF ARTICLE 134, UCMJ.
71 M.J. 196
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided March 22, 2012
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces · decided 2012-03-22
Decided 2012-03-22
¶1CCA 20090615. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER SPECIFICATION 1 OF CHARGE II FAILS TO STATE AN OFFENSE BECAUSE IT DOES NOT EXPRESSLY ALLEGE OR NECESSARILY IMPLY THE TERMINAL ELEMENT OF ARTICLE 134, UCMJ.