Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 N.C. App. 63 - State v. Huggins

71 N.C. App. 63 - State v. Huggins’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
August 2005
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 2005

12 state decisions

60198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Wilkerson · State v. Foust · State v. Redfern · State v. Wrenn · State v. Bates

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The question for the court in ruling upon defendant’s motion for dismissal is whether there is substantial evidence (1) of each essential element of the offense charged, or of a lesser offense included therein, and (2) of defendant’s being the perpetrator of such offense. If substantial evidence of both of the above has been presented at trial, the motion is properly denied. ... In considering a motion to dismiss, the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the State and the State is entitled to every reasonable intendment and every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom. . . . Contradictions and discrepancies in the evidence are strictly for the jury to decide.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Second degree murder is the unlawful killing of a human being with malice but without premeditation and deliberation.” State v. Huggins, 71 N.C.App. 63 , 321 S.E.2d 584, 587 (1984), review denied 313 N.C. 333 , 327 S.E.2d 895 (1985).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.