¶1 (concurring specially). I concur in the opinion prepared by Judge Morris. The tax deed issued to the county is clearly invalid. No notice of expiration of the period of redemption was. given as required by law. There was no service of such notice as prescribed by the law in force when the tax sale was held in December- -1932 (Laws 1927, chapter 266), or as prescribed by chapter 235, Laws 1939.
71 ND 345
1 N.W.2d 338
Anderson v. Roberts
Decided November 26, 1941
North Dakota Supreme Court · decided 1941-11-26
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“We think the inference is clear that in the records in the county auditor’s office dur ing the tax deed proceedings and at least until the land was sold by the county the name of the original owners appeared only as “Cora Shelton et. al.” and that the notice of expiration of the period of redemption was given in accordance with that record.”
quoted by 1 later decision, including Van Raden Homes, Inc. v. Dakota View Estates
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1941-11-26
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 1996
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →