Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 ND 430 - Kelsch v. Dickson

Kelsch v. Dickson’s Empirical Analysis

1941

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
March 1956
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““However wise a man may he, however sound his judgment, and however accurate his knowledge and understanding; nevertheless, he is hound to subordinate to the wisdom, judgment, knowledge and understanding of a superior court, whose order is the law of the case, until modified, or until reversed by higher authority.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““To hold that an order improvidently issued can be violated with impunity is to invite litigants to resort to the use of force sufficient to maintain their rights as they understand them to be. Such a policy should not be adopted in a system of law that prides itself upon having a remedy for every wrong.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.