Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 Nev. 248 - Basic Refractories, Inc. v. Bright

Basic Refractories, Inc. v. Bright’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
3
states following
July 2003
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently July 2003

20 state decisions

120195519601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cunningham v. Cunningham · Gerbig v. Gerbig · Haskell v. Ross · Keeley v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York · Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Kepley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No assignment of errors is necessary. If the appellant does not designate for inclusion the complete record and all the proceedings and evidence in the action, he shall serve with his designation a concise statement of the points on which he intends to rely on the appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.