Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 N.J. 160 - State v. Talbot

State v. Talbot’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

88
cited by 88 later decisions
11
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 83 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 88 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably United States v. Twigg (1978), 465 So. 2d 516 - Cruz v. State (1985)

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 83 state decisions — followed in 11 states

400197619801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Russell · Sorrells v. United States · Sherman v. United States · Hampton v. United States · 21 Ill. 2d 320 - The People v. Strong

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “bottomed on the principle of fundamental fairness”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A]s the part played by the State in the criminal activity increases, the importance of the factor of defendant’s criminal intent decreases, until finally a point may be reached where the methods [employed] by the State to obtain a conviction cannot be countenanced, even though a defendant’s predisposition is shown. Whether the police activity has overstepped the bounds of permissible conduct is a question to be decided by the trial court rather than the jury. [ 71 N.J. at 167-168 ]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “This appeal poses the issue whether entrapment is established as a matter of law if an informant, while acting in concert with an undercover police officer, but unknown to the officer and contrary to instructions, supplies the defendant with heroin for the purpose of then arranging a sale of the heroin by defendant to the undercover officer, which sale is then consummated. We hold that it is. ( 364 A.2d at 10 ).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.