Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 N.J. Super. 294 - Palcsey v. Tepper

71 N.J. Super. 294 - Palcsey v. Tepper’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
12
states following
April 1990
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently April 1990 · most notably Foldi v. Jeffries (1983), France v. APA Transport Corp. (1970)

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 28 state decisions — followed in 12 states

1401962197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kaczorowski v. Kalkosinski · State v. Culver · Long v. Landy · Johnson v. Peoples First National Bank & Trust Co. · HASTINGS BY HASTINGS v. Hastings

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * the question is not one of the absence of duty owed by a parent to his minor child, but instead is one of immunity or disability from suit. The cause of action exists as of the date of the wrongdoing but the courts have interposed a shield of immunity between the family members where the family relationship is still intact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Does the doctrine of immunity from suit between unemancipated minor children and their parents, which exists during the life of the family relationship, extend to and protect the personal representative of the deceased member of the family?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “It is obvious that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court makes a sharp distinction between a suit against a living parent and one against the estate of a deceased parent, denying the first and permitting the latter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.