Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 N.J. Super. 404 - State v. Patfol Inc.

71 N.J. Super. 404 - State v. Patfol Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 1982
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 1982

6 state decisions

40196119701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Alexander v. New Jersey Power & Light Co. · Wright v. Vogt · Sperry and Hutchinson Co. v. Margetts · 26 N.J. Super. 581 - State v. Gratale Brothers, Inc. · 62 N.J. Super. 412 - State v. Metropolitan Iron and Steel Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The defendant argues that the statute, being penal in nature, should be strictly construed. That is, the width of the vehicle being 96 inches, there is no prohibition in the statute governing the width of the load. Such a construction ignores the realities of the situation. It is a matter of common knowledge, and the court may take judicial notice, that loads usually and invariably extend out through the rear of a vehicle. It is also a matter of common knowledge that using safety precautions as directed by N. J. S. A. 39:3-84, the extension of a load in the rear of a vehicle would not be unduly hazardous, as roads are not circumscribed as to length.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.