Lozano v. Archer’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
66 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently November 2012 · most notably Lyon v. Catron County Commissioners (1969), Marez v. Kerr-McGee Nuclear Corp. (1978)
66 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lee v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. · Winter v. Roberson Construction Company · Romero v. H. A. Lott, Inc. · Buffington v. Continental Casualty Company · Kendrick v. Gackle Drilling Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"* * * a decrease of wage earning ability due to a workman's injury suffered by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““We find no merit in appellants’ first contention that the claim for compensation is barred for failure to give notice in writing. * * * The verbal reporting of an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of employment to the employer, or to his manager, in the circumstances here present, satisfies the requirement of ‘actual knowledge.’ Buffington v. Continental Casualty Company, 69 N.M. 365 , 367 P.2d 539 ; Winter v. Roberson Construction Company, 70 N.M. 187 , 372 P.2d 381 , and 2 Larson’s Workmen’s Compensation Law, §§ 78.00, 78.31.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““An employe[e] who is so injured that he can perform no services other than those which are so limited in quality, dependability, or quantity that a reasonably stable market for them does not exist, may well be classified as totally disabled.” (Quoting Lee v. Minneapolis St. Ry. [ 230 Minn. 315 ] 41 N.W.2d 433, 436 (Minn.1950)).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.