Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 N.W.2d 636 - Fleck v. State

Fleck v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
8
states following
December 1992
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently December 1992

14 state decisions

5019551960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Crilly v. Morris · Ives v. Hanson · Solberg v. State Treasurer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘The rule is well settled that where an unimpeached witness testifies distinctly and positively to a fact and is uncon-tradicted, but the statements of the witness are grossly improbable or he has an interest in the question at issue, Courts are not bound to blindly adopt the statements of such witness.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.