People v. Two Wheel Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
September 2007
most recently cited
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“3. No person shall sell or offer for sale fluid milk for an amount which represents an unconscionably excessive price. 4. Whether a price is unconscionably excessive is a question of law for the court. Evidence that: (a) the price charged at retail for fluid milk represents a gross disparity be tween the raw milk price paid to producers plus a reasonable handler’s processing and distribution charge and the price at retail; or (b) the price charged at retail for fluid milk increased a greater amount than the price increased for an equivalent volume paid to producers under an order or interim price of the commissioner pursuant to section two hundred flftyeight-m of the agriculture and markets law; and (c) in addition to paragraphs (a) and (b) of this subdivision, the increased price charged by the person was not attributable to additional charges imposed by its suppliers, or other charges beyond the control of the person, including the cost of labor, shall constitute prima facie proof of a violation of this section in any proceeding commenced by the attorney general pursuant to subdivision five of this section.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.