71 Ohio App. 3d 302 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
58 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently September 2023 · most notably 156 Ohio St. 3d 207 - State v. Cupp (2018), 108 Ohio App. 3d 264 - State v. Gregory (1995)
58 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 68 Ohio App. 3d 567 - State, Ex Rel. Corder v. Wilson · 71 Ohio App. 3d 292 - State v. Logan · 45 Ohio App. 2d 43 - State v. Dawn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a defendant is not entitled to jail-time credit for any period of incarceration which arose from facts which are separate and apart from those on which his current sentence is based.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“The department of rehabilitation and correction shall reduce the stated prison term of a prisoner or, if the prisoner is serving a term for which there is parole eligibility, the minimum and maximum term or the parole eligibility date of the prisoner by the total number of days that the prisoner was confined for any reason arising out of the offense for which the prisoner was convicted and sentenced, including confinement in lieu of bail while awaiting trial, confinement for examination to determine the prisoner's competence to stand trial or sanity, and confinement while awaiting transportation to the place where the prisoner is to serve the prisoner's prison term.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“In this case, appellant was incarcerated on a prior misdemeanor criminal conviction which was completely unrelated to the offense for which he was later sentenced by the trial court. Because the sentence in the municipal court case did not arise out of the offense for which appellant was convicted in this case, appellant is not entitled to additional jail-time credit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.