71 Ohio App. 3d 34 - Presley v. Presley’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently July 2025
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 30 Ohio App. 3d 261 - State v. Wagner · 43 Ohio App. 3d 44 - State v. Miller · 31 Ohio App. 3d 152 - State v. Morgan · 28 Ohio App. 2d 57 - Orlow v. Vilas · 41 Ohio App. 2d 209 - North Royalton Education Ass'n v. North Royalton Board of Education
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(4) Statements for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment. Statements made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment and describing medical history, or past or present symptoms, pain, or sensations, or the inception or general character of the cause or external source thereof insofar as reasonably pertinent to diagnosis or treatment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“social worker was in the best position to help determine the proper treatment (i.e., which home was free of child abuse) for the minor. Consequently, the social worker's testimony was admissible under Evid. R. 803(4) as a statement for purposes of treatment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.