71 Ohio App. 3d 455 - State v. Barton’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably 104 Ohio App. 3d 812 - State v. Elliott (1995), 97 Ohio App. 3d 515 - State v. Chappell (1994)
32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · North Carolina v. Pearce · 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin · Ohio v. Roberts · State v. Bradley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although proof of knowledge may suffice to prove recklessness, proof of recklessness is not sufficient to prove knowledge.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““I. Mr. Gary was denied due process (Ohio Const. Article I, Section 16 and U.S. Const.Amend. XIV) and improperly convicted of a crime without indictment by a grand jury (Ohio Const. Article I, Section 10 and U.S. ConstAmend. V) when the trial court sha sponte amended felonious assault to endangering children which is not a lesser included offense of felonious assault.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“testimony did not constitute fundamental error of such a magnitude as to affect either a substantial right of the defendant or the fairness, integrity or public reputation of the proceedings. See Crim. R. 52(B). {¶ 28} The Ohio Supreme Court has made it clear that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.