71 Ohio App. 3d 497 - Sereda v. Szogle’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2019
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Pitts v. Ohio Department of Transportation · State ex rel. Boardwalk Shopping Center, Inc. v. Court of Appeals · Edwards v. Passarelli Bros. Automotive Service, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t has been consistently held that a satisfaction of judgment is a final appealable order from which a direct appeal must be taken within the time prescribed by App.R. 3.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“recognized [that] the underlying cognovit judgment had been satisfied”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.