71 Ohio App. 3d 740 - State v. Wolf’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 2020
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · State v. Jenkins · State v. Landrum · Celebrezze v. Netzley · Amato v. General Motors Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There is no denial of substantial right, nor is it impracticable to wait until final adjudication. R.C. 2505.02. A request for expert assistance, made in a more specific manner, may also be refiled at any time prior to or during the course of the trial. Appellant will not lose his right to review of the issue. Should an abuse of discretion and prejudice be demonstrated, defendant's conviction can be reversed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Page“the [trial] court's refusal to permit expert assistance [at state expense] is not a final appealable order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Page
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.