Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 Ohio App. 3d 86 - State v. Stuber

71 Ohio App. 3d 86 - State v. Stuber’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently November 2025

18 state decisions

1001990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Eley · State v. Kidder · Smith v. Smith · Ohio v. Grubbs · 50 Ohio App. 3d 25 - City of Bucyrus v. Fawley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * a person cannot knowingly cause or attempt to cause physical harm to a family member or member of a household without at the same time *Page 588 recklessly causing him `inconvenience, annoyance or alarm' by threatening harm or by engaging in violent or turbulent behavior. * * * `[I]t is not significant that the common elements of these two offenses were not stated in identical language in the statutes, because these common elements are implicit in the conduct that constitutes the offenses. The courts have not required an express inclusion of the lesser offense in the definition of the greater. * * *'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is not necessary for the prosecution or the court to formally present a defendant with written charges of each lesser offense which may be proven by elements necessary for proof of the greater. A greater offense properly charged a fortiori charges the lesser included offenses by implication.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “if lesser offenses are included within the offense charged, the defendant may be found not guilty of the degree charged but guilty of * * * a lesser included offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.