Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 OHIOST3D 342 - State v. Manley

State v. Manley’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably State v. Ireland (Slip Opinion) (2018), State v. Nucklos (2009)

28 state decisions

1201994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Jenks · Mullaney v. Wilbur · State v. Long · State v. Adams · State v. Moreland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In reviewing a claim of insufficient evidence, `[t]he relevant inquiry is whether, after viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.' (Internal citations omitted.) A claim that a jury verdict is against the manifest weight of the evidence involves a different test. `The court, reviewing the entire record, weighs the evidence and all reasonable inferences, considers the credibility of witnesses and determines whether in resolving conflicts in the evidence, the jury clearly lost its way and created such a manifest miscarriage of justice that the conviction must be reversed and new trial ordered. The discretionary power to grant a new trial should be exercised only in the exceptional case in which the evidence weighs heavily against the conviction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`Notice of plain error under Crim.R. 52(B) is to be taken with the utmost caution, under exceptional circumstances and only to prevent a manifest miscarriage of justice.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`Plain error does not exist unless it can be said that but for the error, the outcome of the trial would clearly have been otherwise.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.