Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 Okla. 46 - Haskell v. Ross

Haskell v. Ross’s Empirical Analysis

1918

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
July 1955
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 1955

10 state decisions

4019181920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barnes v. Lynch · Elliott v. Orton · City of Lawton v. Ayres

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Any act on the part of a defendant by which he impliedly recognizes the validity of a judgment against him operates as a waiver to appeal therefrom or to bring error to reverse it.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.