71 So. 3d 492 - State v. Richardson’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
September 2018
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Crawford v. Washington · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Pointer v. Texas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“constitutes an integral part of the act or transaction that is the subject of the present proceedings.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“substantial risk of grave prejudice to the defendant”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“State v. Richardson , 46,360 (La. App. 2 Cir. 6/22/11), 71 So.3d 492 , citing State v. Jackson , 625 So.2d 146 (La. 1993). This rule of exclusion stems from the”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jackson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.