Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 SW2D 352 - Wright v. State

Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1934

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 1979
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Heidenheimer · Middlebrook Bros. v. Zapp · Purdom v. Boyd · Miller v. Marx & Kempner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is now settled that a married woman cannot enter into a partnership in a mercantile business with her husband or with any one else. Miller v. Marx & Kempner, supra; Middlebrook Bros. v. Zapp, 73 Tex. 29 , 10 S.W. 732 ; Purdom v. Boyd, 82 Tex. [130] 135, 17 S.W. 606 . And if her separate estate were invested in the business she merely became a creditor of the firm to that extent, and not a partner.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.