Karr v. Cockerham’s Empirical Analysis
1934
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently July 1987
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ormsby v. Ratcliffe · Archibald v. Jacobs · O'Brien v. Woeltz · Brooks v. Chatham · Johnston v. Martin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The burden was upon Mrs. Cockerham to trace the $1,000 in to the Sudan property. Diltz v. Dodson (Tex. Civ. App.) 207 S.W. 356 ; Spencer v. Pettit (Tex. Civ. App.) 268 S.W. 779 ; Id. (Tex.Com.App.) 2 S.W.2d 422 . This she failed to do.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Karr v. Cockerham“with the intent to hinder, delay and defraud his creditors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Karr v. Cockerham
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.