Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 S.W.3d 313 - In Re Gamble

In Re Gamble’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston))

Relationships

Relies on Storey v. Central Hide & Rendering Co. · Ex Parte Emory H. Hughes · Blum v. Lanier · Brown v. Walker · Cannan v. Green Oaks Apts., Ltd.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is the candidate who is primarily responsible and accountable for properly completing and timely filing a proper application for a place on the ballot”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “serves as a safety net for candidates who file their applications early in the filing period ....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[c]ertainly, the candidate has a duty to file a compliant application before the filing deadline.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.