Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 SW3D 340 - Puente v. State

Puente v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 2016
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Garcia v. Dial · Manuel v. State · Ervin v. State · Proctor v. State · State v. Roberts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “was five years unless the trial judge, at any time during the period of community supervision, extended it up to ten years.” Id. This observation had absolutely no bearing on our disposition of the particular issue in the case, however, and was made uncritically, without recourse to the specific language of Section 15. It was, in short, the purest form of obiter dictum, by which we are hardly bound today. . See Tex.Code Crim. Proc. art. 42.12, § 5(a) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.