Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 SW3D 346 - Wilson v. State

Wilson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

88
cited by 88 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

88 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Soberon v. United States · Latimer v. Stainer · Thomas v. State · Turner v. State · Broxton v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In all cases in which evidence of a person’s character or character trait is admissible, proof may be made by testimony as to reputation or by testimony in the form of an opinion. In a criminal case, to be qualified to testify at the guilt stage of trial concerning the character or character trait of an accused, a witness must have been familiar with the reputation, or with the underlying facts or information upon which the opinion is based, prior to the day of the offense. In all cases where testimony is admitted under this rule, on cross-examination inquiry is allowable into relevant specific instances of conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “point of error on appeal must comport with the objection made at trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.