Lopez v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2006
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Drye v. United States · King v. State · Moscariello v. United States · Mosley v. State · Johnson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under Carranza, the court of criminal appeals imposed upon the defendant the burden of proof to show he was unaware of the consequences of his plea and that he was misled or harmed by the admonishment of the trial court. Carranza [ v. State ], 980 S.W.2d [653] at 658 [(Tex.Crim.App.1998)]. The court of criminal appeals has since made it clear that an appellant has no burden to show harm under rule 44.2(b). Johnson v. State, 43 S.W.3d 1, 5 (Tex.Crim.App. 2001).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fakeye v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.