Eckhoff v. Eckhoff’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
March 2011
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Murphy v. Carron · Business Men's Assurance Co. of America v. Graham · Pirtle v. Cook · City of Ferguson v. Nelson · Pearman v. Department of Social Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The party seeking to show that an order is an order nunc pro tunc must show that the original judgment entry did not accurately reflect the court’s actual judgment and that the subsequent order merely caused the record to conform to the true judicial determination of the parties’ rights. 956 S.W.2d at 243 (internal citations omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sullivan v. Miner“Clerical mistakes in judgments, orders or other parts of the record and errors therein arising from oversight or omission may be corrected by the court at any time of its own initiative or on the motion of any party and after such notice, if any, as the court orders.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sullivan v. Miner
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.